Learning attributes from evaluating a PR campaign (S0133122)

Module 7 Blog Topic: Apart from campaign outcomes, what, if anything, can a public relations practitioner learn from the evaluation of a campaign?

A public relations (PR) practitioner can learn a great deal from the evaluation of a campaign, in fact, understanding and learning from the evaluating process supports the fundamentals of effective public relations. The four essential steps for effective public relations are:

  1. Research – Gain information about the campaign’s target public
  2. Planning – Central management function. Determine objectives and strategies.
  3. Communication – Create a persuasive message for the target public
  4. Evaluation / Measurement – Accountability

The evaluation / measurement stage and the key accountability information learned from this process include:

  • Assessment of campaign’s budget – Was too much spent? Are the costs justifiable?
  • Assessment of all areas used in the campaign – Were all efforts involved effective?
  • Assessment of objectives – Were all goals and objectives met?

There are many measurement techniques used in PR campaigns that are used from a variety of sources. Wilcox et al. (2013, p.128) states “sophisticated techniques are used, including computerised news clip analysis, survey sampling, quasi-experimental designs in which the audience is divided into groups that see different aspects of a public relations campaign, and attempts to correlate efforts directly with sales.” Macnamara (2002) explains the PR practitioner will also learn from these methods that the overall value of a campaign can be measured, and most importantly, the evaluation stage is the only stage which can determine the ultimate accountability measure; Return on Investment (ROI). The definition of ROI (Entrepreneur Encyclopaedia 2014) is the most common profitability ratio with many ways to be measured. A ROI has been increasingly used by PR practitioners to demonstrate campaign results to decision-makers and other stakeholders (Curtis 2013).

With all the above mentioned evaluation techniques and information available, a PR practitioner can gain a significant range of knowledge, as well as gain a well-informed perspective for future events/campaigns.

Curtis, T 2005, ‘ROI or evidence-based PR: The language of public relations evaluation’, PRism Online Journal, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 1-10, viewed 20 December 2014, http://www.prismjournal.org/fileadmin/Praxis/Files/Journal…/Watson.pdf

Entrepreneur Encyclopaedia 2014, Return on investment,  viewed 20 December 2014, https://www.google.com.au/search?output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=ROI+defintion&btnK=

Macnamara, J 2002, ‘PR Metrics – Research for Planning and Evaluation of PR and Corporate Communication, MASS Communication Group, NSW. http://www.pria.com.au/sitebuilder/resources/knowledge/…/prmetricspaper.pdf

Wlicox D, Cameron G, Reber B and Shin JH 2013, Think Public Relations, 2nd edn, Pearson Education, New Jersey.

____________________________________________________________________________________________________

Tris Kerslake (Lecturer) – COMM11110 Public Relations @ CQUniversity
Monday, 2 February 2015
SHELLEE MCCARTHY RECEIVED A ‘HIGH DISTINCTION’ FOR THIS BLOG
Grading System
Fail / Pass / Credit / Distinction / High Distinction
Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s